Steve Bassett Interview

[Kim323]

I really enjoyed the Steve Bassett interview. I'd heard him interviewed a couple of days before on Paranormal Cafe. And of course, I've heard him before at other times. Though always the same message, he does have a way of varying his presentations so that they are always interesting and intriguing. I tell you, he does sound very convincing, but still.... I'd be interested in others' opinions on Steve's views and predictions. Kim

[Ankhes]

I really enjoyed the show, too. I hope he comes back on because he began to get onto something else at the end and was out of time.
I don't know where he comes up with his elaborate scenarios that he presents almost as fact, but they are interesting and, I suppose, plausible. I haven't yet caught up on all the past shows so I haven't heard him before. I appreciated Gene and David giving the quick recap because I needed it.

Does anyone else really think disclosure will come in 2009? I suppose anything is possible, but I'm a little cynical about that one.

[Rick Deckard]

Originally Posted by Ankhes

Does anyone else really think disclosure will come in 2009?

I'm sure some people do - but not me.

[~Foo Fighter~]

Originally Posted by Ankhes

I really enjoyed the show, too. I hope he comes back on because he began to get onto something else at the end and was out of time.
I don't know where he comes up with his elaborate scenarios that he presents almost as fact, but they are interesting and, I suppose, plausible. I haven't yet caught up on all the past shows so I haven't heard him before. I appreciated Gene and David giving the quick recap because I needed it.

Does anyone else really think disclosure will come in 2009? I suppose anything is possible, but I'm a little cynical about that one.

My opinion (based purely on the observation that secrecy breeds more secrecy) is that nothing meaningful will be released unless the government/cryptocracy is actually forcibly overthrown. Not that I'm advocating anything...

It's just that making things seceret is a facet of control. It's the most basic illustration of the fact that we are RULED, and that we have AGREED to be ruled when one set of citizens determins that they are above another set of citizens and they self-determine that they have the power to use public money as they wish with no accountability to the public at large.

Of course that goes hand-in-hand with the oligarchy behind the crypt-archy that setup the intellegence state for the security of their economic empire.

So the answer is NO, nothing will be disclosed.

~Foo Fighter~

[Rick Deckard]

Originally Posted by ~Foo Fighter~

It's just that making things seceret is a facet of control. It's the most basic illustration of the fact that we are RULED, and that we have AGREED to be ruled when one set of citizens determins that they are above another set of citizens and they self-determine that they have the power to use public money as they wish with no accountability to the public at large.

Good post. I agree.

[auntiegrav]

Originally Posted by Ankhes

I don't know where he comes up with his elaborate scenarios that he presents almost as fact, but they are interesting and, I suppose, plausible.

Does anyone else really think disclosure will come in 2009? I suppose anything is possible, but I'm a little cynical about that one.

I like the point Bassett makes that if you want to move to the next step in the subject, you have to get into the mindset that the visitations are a given fact, and to stop trying to prove something is real or not. It wastes your time and fulfills the purpose of the cryptarchy. Like a bull or bear Wall Street, perhaps Disclosure could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By assuming it will happen, and talking to people as though it will (especially influential people that are going to be elected), then perhaps we can influence the trend to speed up at least some disclosure of secrets that could improve the state of the world.

I have said long ago that Dick C. and his bunch had something up their sleeve when they invaded Iraq that gave them much more confidence in the outcome than was prudent. If they were stupid people, I could understand bombing and invading the (2nd?) biggest unused oil fields in the world at the risk of losing control. Greg Palast insists it was to control the price fluctuations and to maintain the dollar standard. I said it was to get the populace accustomed to paying high prices for energy, so that when Disclosure happens, those in key positions can rake in the dough for the technology. It's part of the setup, but it depends upon eventual disclosure.
It also explains the religious avoidance of energy conservation programs.

Just my 2 cents.

P.S. There are a lot of current industries which will be boosted into the next century by clean energy sources. Electric motors, electric control systems, commodity metals, etc.
I'd keep an eye on Westinghouse and GE, perhaps the European industrials are in on it, too. What better time to see your stock explode than going from a Depression to Utopia on a properly timed First Contact situation.....
All those rich people are still going to want fresh tomatoes, too.

[auntiegrav]

Oh, and I'm not saying the same plan for jacking the oil prices couldn't be implemented without a Disclosure schedule, just that both scenarios work, with one involving an 'out' for the fascist New World Order. Do you think a guy like Dick takes a dump without a plan?

[Ankhes]

Originally Posted by auntiegrav

Do you think a guy like Dick takes a dump without a plan?

Well, I would have thought he'd plan to clean up better after himself.

[auntiegrav]

Originally Posted by Ankhes

Well, I would have thought he'd plan to clean up better after himself.

He's got people for that. You and I, man... You and I.

[Ankhes]

Originally Posted by auntiegrav

He's got people for that. You and I, man... You and I.

Aw, crap!